The Middle East Channel

The unexpected logic of the EU’s ban on Iranian oil

The European Union's recent agreement in principle to gradually ban Iranian crude oil imports has brought to a head a long-running dispute between Europe's economic and foreign ministries. Economic ministries feared politicizing oil because any disruption could hurt fragile economies and send prices soaring. Foreign ministries, for their part, were eager to turn the screws on Tehran with an oil embargo that would raise the costs of the country's alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons. This gap is narrowing fast -- but not only because of the urgency of increased diplomatic pressure.

EU ministers will discuss the embargo on January 23 after two weeks of saber-rattling in the Persian Gulf. Iran's leaders have directly linked restrictions on crude exports to the regime's willingness to shut the Strait of Hormuz. Last month, Mohammad-Reza Rahimi, Iran's first vice president, warned that "If they impose sanctions on Iran's oil exports, then even one drop of oil cannot flow from the Strait of Hormuz." His comments came days before President Barack Obama approved new U.S. sanctions against the Central Bank of Iran, which manages the country's oil transactions.

The stakes are high for Tehran. The regime depends on oil revenue for 50 percent of its budget. Last year that sum amounted to $73 billion. Iran exports 450,000 barrels per day (b/d) to Europe, which amounts to 20 percent of the country's total crude exports. Some observers worry that an EU embargo could backfire and send oil prices sky-high. But these fears may be exaggerated.

Any shock to the system will be cushioned by several factors. Libya and Iraq are set to increase exports this year; these additional barrels could replace Iran's share of the European market. New projections from the International Energy Agency (IEA) are also encouraging. In their last public report, the IEA offered a "more comfortable market outlook than looked likely six months ago." According to the report, global demand for crude from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) will likely shrink this year by 300,000 b/d, thus providing more slack in a tight market.

The newfound EU agreement comes at a time when Libyan and Iraqi production is set to increase significantly. Both countries will thus have a chance to enter -- or in Libya's case, re-enter -- the European market and offset any supply disruption. Seasonal oil demand changes and projections for global consumption in 2012 also suggest price hikes can be avoided if Iranian crude is sold elsewhere. The regime would likely be forced to do so at a discount and lose precious revenue at a time when the Iranian economy is already under tremendous stress.

Libyan exports recovered faster than expected after being shut down by civil war. Libya now produces 1 million b/d with exports hovering around 500,000 b/d. Representatives of the national oil company and their international partners are convinced the country will return to pre-war production levels by the middle of 2012. Within six months, Libya could produce 1.7 million b/d with exports nearly tripling to 1.3 million b/d. Especially encouraging is recent news that Es-Sidr, Libya's largest oil export terminal, restarted crude loadings this month. In January 2011, Es-Sidr loaded nearly 450,000 b/d -- about as much as Iran stands to lose if the EU ban is adopted. Much of that oil went to Europe before the civil war, and so the Libyans are well positioned to cushion the market in case of embargo.

Iraq is also on track to increase crude exports in the first quarter of 2012. Right now the maximum export capacity from southern Iraq -- where the government's authority over oilfields and revenue is not in question -- stands at 1.8 million b/d. New pipelines will soon come online that connect to single point moorings in the Gulf where tankers can load crude. Each mooring can handle up to 900,000 b/d and the first will become operational in the next three months. According to estimates made last month by Hussain al-Shahristani, Iraq's deputy prime minister for energy affairs, officials believe southern fields alone will export 225,000 b/d more in 2012. Northern fields will export another 175,000 b/d.

Combined, Iraq and Libya could replace Iran's lost crude destined for Europe. It may not be appropriate to label Iranian crude "lost," however, as Iran may still sell its 450,000 b/d elsewhere -- but at a discount. As Europe distances itself from Iran and the number of possible buyers shrinks, the remaining customers will enjoy more leverage during contract negotiations. China, Iran's biggest customer, recently signaled that it's willing to play hardball: the country's largest oil company -- Sinopec -- cut January purchases of Iranian crude by half after pricing negotiations stalled. New terms may not be finalized until March. In the meantime, Chinese traders are buying pricier alternatives instead of Iranian crude. Others may twist Iran's arm the same way.

Chances are the regime will not curb production even if it temporarily lacks customers. Doing so is risky because the country's oil infrastructure is not in prime condition; after decades of sanctions, shutting in production could result in unforeseen technical failures, and future problems when trying to return to maximum output. Continued production means Iran will be forced to store oil while waiting for buyers to satisfy current contracts. With 450,000 barrels accumulating daily, Iran could find itself with millions of barrels of oil -- stored at home and off-shore -- waiting for the right customer months later. Opportunistic traders could eventually buy up dozens of these cargoes at a steep discount.

Any ban will grant Europe a few months to wind down business with Iran and gradually shift to other producers. That shift, should it commence, would occur during the second quarter of this year, the traditional period of weak worldwide demand. It seems very likely that Arab producers like Libya and Iraq will gain or regain their market share if given the chance. And, if the IEA's predictions are correct, the shrinking demand for OPEC crude may make the European transition considerably smoother.

Matthew M. Reed is a Middle East specialist at Foreign Reports, Inc., a consulting firm in Washington, DC. More of his commentary can be found at Al Ajnabee, where he writes about the Middle East and U.S. foreign policy. The views expressed here are solely his.

Sean Gallup/Getty Images

The Middle East Channel

In a rare public speech, Assad says he won’t step down

In a rare public speech, Assad says he won't step down

In Damascus, in his first speech since June, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad asserted he would not step down, saying "I will only leave this position when all of the people want me to." He acknowledged that deaths had occurred in Syria over the past 10 months, but denied ordering soldiers to open fire on civilians and maintained that foreign-backed terrorists are responsible for the country's violence. He said: "Our priority now is to regain security which we basked in for decades, and this can only be achieved by hitting the terrorists with an iron fist." Assad said he was willing to talk to the opposition but dismissed calls for a unity government (for its part, the main opposition party -- the Syrian National Council -- has insisted his stepping down is a prerequisite for any talks). Assad went on to say that his top priority is reform, promising a multi-party system, a constitutional referendum in March, and parliamentary elections in the months following. He also lashed out at the Arab League for suspending Syria from the body and criticized its recent observer mission by asking, "When have the Arabs ever stood with Syria?" Meanwhile, the opposition has raised concerns about Arab League monitors in the country after Monday's announcement of the deployment of additional monitors and an extension of the mission to January 19, claiming the observers are merely "buying time" for the Syrian regime to crush its opponents. According to the United Nations, over 5,000 people have been killed in Syria since the uprising began last March, with other estimates putting the number at over 6,000.

Headlines  

  • A wave of attacks across Iraq mostly targeting Shiite pilgrims killed at least 19 people and wounded 60. Meanwhile, an al-Qaeda-affiliated group has claimed responsibility for at least 37 recent attacks in Baghdad.
  • Despite repeated U.S. commitments to close Guantanamo, the prison has reached its 10-year anniversary. With no releases in a year, and recent legislation allowing for indefinite military detention, it seems likely to remain an ongoing fixture of America's 'war on terror.'
  • The Muslim Brotherhood and Salafis have taken the lead as runoff polling begins for the third round of Egyptian parliamentary elections.
  • Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad began a five-day Latin American tour in an effort to strengthen ties there as the United States and Europe increase sanctions.
  • Israel passed harsh new illegal immigration legislation targeted at African migrants which allows for the detainment of suspects for 3 years without trial.

Daily Snapshot

Iraqi Shiite Muslim pilgrims walk to the holy city of Kerbala to mark Arbaeen in Baghdad's Dora district on January 10, 2012. The Arbaeen religious festival which is the 40th day after Ashura commemorating the killing of Prophet Mohammed's grandson Imam Hussein in the seventh century (read AHMAD AL-RUBAYE/AFP/Getty Images).

Arguments and Analysis

‘Can U.S. adjust to Islamist Mideast?' (William B. Quandt, Politico)

"The vision of a Pax Americana in the region - always a pipe dream -- has evaporated. We should stop thinking in terms of "client states" that will do our bidding in return for aid. We still have many key interests in the region -- the free flow of oil at tolerable prices, Arab-Israeli peace, nonproliferation of nuclear weapons, encouraging peaceful democratic change and defusing the intense anti-Americanism that has swept much of the region recently. For most of these goals, we will find partners in the region -- including Islamists, who will be willing to cooperate if treated with respect. Obama had it right in 2009, when he spoke of the need for "mutual interests and mutual respect" as the basis for improved relations with the Muslim world."

‘The Saudi response to the Arab Spring: containment and co-option' (Madawi Al Rasheed, Open Democracy)

"With internal protest crushed and apparent Western silence over the need for political reform, the Saudi regime seems to be comfortable in the short term. However, given the continuing lack of progress, increased mobilisation on specific issues such as relaxing guardianship rules, women's franchise, the right to drive and the rights of political prisoners is likely to increase. Although these are unlikely to lead to systemic changes they nonetheless act to familiarise the population with the arts of mobilisation and peaceful resistance- and this is entirely new to Saudi Arabia."

‘In Syria, what does Russia want?' (Hussain Abdul-Hussain, Bitter Lemons)

"Should the Arab mission be deemed a failure, world opinion would certainly tilt in favor of UN intervention, in which case Russia would find itself alone at the UN fending off another western diplomatic offensive against Assad...In the second diplomatic showdown at the UN, expected in February, Russia might not rush to the defense of Assad and could instead come to a compromise with other world powers over his removal. Perhaps sensing that Moscow's pro-Assad stance could change, chief of the opposition Syrian National Council Burhan Ghalioun told Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov during a meeting in Moscow in mid-November that should Assad fall, Russian interests in Syria would be "guaranteed.""

Latest from the Channel

-- 'Don't write off the Arab League in Syria...yet' by Richard Gowan

-- 'Tunisia's student Salafis' by Monica Marks

 

--Tom Kutsch & Mary Casey