Since 1979 the United States has spent nearly $2 billion annually on aid to Egypt. Approximately two-thirds has been spent on "foster[ing] a well-trained, modern Egyptian military," with the purpose of ensuring stability in the country and in the region. The remainder of the aid has funded development and economic aid programs targeting civil society development, political party training, and educational exchanges, among other aims. In light of the Egyptian people's ongoing and forceful demonstrations for the removal of President Hosni Mubarak and their calls for a free and democratic political order, the U.S. should shift its aid distribution so that development aid is on par with funding to the military.
President Obama has already called for political change in Egypt leading to more freedom, opportunity and justice for the Egyptian people. In remarks on February 1, the President went so far as to press for an immediate and "orderly transition," leading to free and fair elections rooted in democratic principles. It is now time to begin putting in place the policies that support these words.
When the inevitable collapse of Mubarak's regime takes place - in days, weeks, or months from now - Egyptians will have the opportunity to create a freer, more democratic and representative government. There will be more real space for civil society groups to function and political parties will have more freedom to organize and contest elections. And the United States will have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to live up to American rhetoric about democracy, freedom, and human rights. The United States should therefore be fully prepared to offer assistance to these groups and parties, whose growth and development Mubarak cynically and successfully stifled throughout three decades of dictatorship.
While Congress has entertained the notion of cutting some portion of US funding to Egypt in order to send a message to President Mubarak, the Egyptian people need to hear the message that the U.S. supports their struggle for a free and democratic Egypt. By shifting the relative amounts of current U.S. funding so that development aid and military financing enjoy the same level of support, the U.S. has the opportunity to make good on its commitment to democracy and human rights without alienating the Egyptian military and still sending a strong message to Mubarak.
Through existing programs like the State Department's Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI), non-governmental organizations such as the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX), and a variety of local partners in Egypt, additional funding could enable exactly the types of assistance Egyptians will most need as they work to create a new, accountable, democratic, and responsive political order. These programs and organizations already have initiatives to carry out political party training, election monitoring, and building the capacity of civil society organizations. These activities were less effective and meaningful in an Egypt living under the weight of an authoritarian regime, which viewed them suspiciously as attempts to create the necessary conditions for a more democratic order. Organizations like NDI have struggled to carry out their work in Mubarak's Egypt, but as the country experiences a transition from autocracy to representative democracy, the U.S. should be ready and willing to provide the practical training and advice that Egyptians will need and that the above organizations and programs are meant to provide.
MEPI provides a concrete example of how the above-mentioned programs were hampered in the past and how they could be more effective as Egypt transitions to a democratic system. In 2005, when President Mubarak announced that Egypt would hold multi-party elections later in the year, it was MEPI's small grants program that allowed the U.S. embassy in Cairo to identify and fund local groups to conduct election monitoring and civic education. At the time, the work of these local groups was rendered impotent by the regime's orchestrated efforts to retain power. In an Egypt actively transitioning to a democratic order, it is exactly these types of programs that are relevant and necessary.
Indeed, U.S. development assistance has made a measurable impact in advancing the democratic aims of citizens in many Arab countries. To cite just one example, NDI's work in Yemen across the spectrum of parties - Islamist and secular alike - in the last decade helped Yemenis to hold more genuinely democratic elections by fostering dialogue between opposition parties and helping them to organize greater voter turnout than at any time in the past. The inclusion of Islamist parties in this work - such as in Yemen - has helped to bring them into the fold of pragmatic groups contesting elections in a flawed but improving democratic political system.
What's more, shifting the relative levels of existing funding will not cost the United States any additional money, though it will buy for the Egyptian people more tangible and enduring improvements in their lives than the purchase of yet another installation of the newest weapons systems. The decades of Mubarak's authoritarian rule squelched Egypt's political opposition, left the notion of freely contested democratic elections a foreign phenomenon, and criminalized the gathering of citizens to press their government for meaningful change - an essential role played by civil societies everywhere. Recovering from such repression will take exactly the types of training and experience that the U.S. has to offer.
In his speech at Cairo University in 2009, President Obama affirmed that governments that are transparent, respect the rule of law, and rule by consent of the governed ultimately are more stable, successful, and secure. Facilitating the Egyptian people's efforts to create a democratic order in the country will help provide for such a stable, successful, and secure partner in the region, as it is now clear that President Mubarak is not capable of such a thing.
For decades now the United States has acted as though stability in Egypt - a stability that masked profound inequalities and injustices - was more important than freedom for Egypt's citizens. While the U.S. cannot turn back the clock, it can make the right decision moving forward and offer to Egyptians some of the crucial skills and tools they will need to develop a free, just, and democratic country. It is difficult to imagine a more opportune place or time for the U.S. to make good on its commitment to democracy in the Middle East.
Andrew Masloski is the Director of Educational Outreach at America Abroad Media.